Genres in the Lovecraftian Library

by Robert M. Price

copyright © 1982 by Robert M. Price
reprinted by permission of Robert M. Price

As all our readers know too well, one of the staples of Lovecraftian fiction, whether actually penned by HPL or by his acolytes, is the "mouldy hidden manuscript". Lovecraft himself invented several, and thus opened a floodgate for similar efforts by his imitators. Leaving aside questions about the propriety or effectiveness of this ever-burgeoning library of "rare" and "secret" texts, the present essay seeks merely to draw a few boundaries within the cluttered terrain. In light of recent developments, Lin Carter's glossary "H. P. Lovecraft: The Books" could stand some updating. But our task is even more modest than this. For we want simply to describe the principle genres of occult-related literature now loading the sagging shelves of the Mythos.

Grimoires

First, as might be expected, prominent among our texts are grimoires, books containing recipes and prescriptions for spells. Real books of this kind include The Sixth and Seventh Books of Moses, The True Grimoire, and The Great Grimoire. From the Arkham archives, we might select Ludvig Prinn's De Vermis Mysteriis (Robert Bloch). Depending on the connotation of "worm", the title might mean either "secrets of the grave" or "secrets of the Dragon". Dragon would denote either Satanism (cf. Revelation 12:9) or alchemy, of which the dragon is the symbol. If "secrets of the Dragon" is intended, we would have a parallel to the modern European grimoire The Fiery Dragon.

Cultes des Goules by Comte d'Erlette might be a grimoire, providing that the French "cult" is taken as meaning "worship", the title then being understood as "The Worship of the Ghouls". Otherwise, see our next category below. By the way, Eddy C. Bertin gives the Comte's personal name as "Francois-Honore Balfour".

There is, surprisingly, similar ambiguity in the case of the chief Mythos book, the Necronomicon. Only in Lovecraft's later stories does the book of Abdul Alhazred appear as a grimoire. In earlier tales, especially "The Hound", the notorious tome is of quite a different nature (again, see below). Other Mythos grimoires include Lumley's Cthäat Aquadingen and Michael S. Warnes's Black Tome of Alsophocus.

Demonologies

Before Lovecraft made the Necronomicon into a grimoire, he was explicit that it fell under the rubric of a "demonology", i.e., a text like the medieval Malleus Malifecarum, a guidebook to heretical beliefs, to be used in suppressing them. In "The Hound", reference is made to "the old Arab daemonologist" Abdul Alhazred. He hates and fears the horrors he relates. Note his distaste for wizards in the passages quoted in "The Festival". Interestingly, though HPL himself turned the book into a grimoire in later years, his followers (Derleth, Carter, et al.) persisted in seeing Alhazred's tome as a demonology.

Returning to d'Erlette's Cultes des Goules, it too is likely to be a demonology if "cultes" denotes "cults" (thus, "Ghoulish Cults"), as in Kenneth Grant's Cults of the Shadow or in the Unaussprechlichen Kulten of Fvindvuf von Junzt. The latter is, of course, one of the foundational volumes in the Cthulhu Mythos. It was invented by Robert E. Howard. Incidentally, Von Junzt's first name as given above is supplied by Lovecraft. A less fanciful version used by L. Sprague deCamp and Lin Carter is "Friedrich Wilhelm von Junzt". As for the name of the volume itself, it is most often, but incorrectly, translated as "Nameless Cults". But "unaussprechlichen" denotes "unspeakable" not in the sense of "unknown", but rather in the sense of "indescribable" or "unmentionable" (cf. Ephesians 5:12; "It is shameful even to speak of what is done in secret."). Eddy C. Bertin introduced a thinly-veiled duplicate of Von Junzt's work in his story "Darkness, My Name Is". It is Kazaj Heinz Vogel's Of the Damned, or: A Treatise About the Hideous Cults of the Old. Both heresiologists were eighteenth century Germans.

Probably another demonology is The Confessions of Clithanus the Monk (August Derleth, "The Passing of Eric Holme"). It would seem to embody the penitential and/or devotional musings of a converted warlock. Though it is said to contain at least one spell summoning a sea-monster, Clithanus may have included it in the course of refuting and denouncing his former beliefs, much as St. Augustine described Manichaeanism in his lengthy repudiation of it in his own Confessions. Finally, Rev. Ward Phillips's Thaumaturgical Prodigies in the New English Canaan is also a work of this kind, being modeled on Cotton Mather's Magnalia.

Scriptures

Our third category is that of occult scriptures, those books like Aradia: The Gospel of the Witches; The Satanic Bible; or The Book of Shadows, which are used in occult or pagan liturgy. They would correspond to the prayer books, missals, and lectionaries of traditional religions. Cthulhu-cult lore includes scriptures such as Ramsey Campbell's Revelations of Glaaki, Lovecraft's Dhol Chants, and Carter's Rituals of Yhe. We might also note HPL's Seven Cryptical Books of Hsan, which seem analogous to the divination manual I Ching.

Non-Human Chronicles

Fourth in our list are prehistoric or extraterrestrial records. The foremost examples are Lovecraft's Pnakotic Manuscripts, Richard F. Searight's Eltdown Shards, and Clark Ashton Smith's The Book of Eibon. Regarding the last named, one may question whether it rightfully belongs to the Cthulhu Mythos at all. In a mood of extravagant expansiveness, however, HPL adopted Smith's Hyperborean stories lock, stock, and barrel into the Mythos, mentioning Eibon and "toadlike Tsathoggua" nearly as often as his own scriptures and demons. Ah well, no use crying over spilt slime.

Other survivals from nonhuman times and climes include Derleth's Celaeno Fragments and R'lyeh Text; Lumley's G'harne Fragments; and Carter's Zanthu Tablets and Ponape Scripture. The last volume is, down to the very palm-fronds it is printed on, a take-off on the already fictitious Stanzas of Dzyan or Book of Dzyan trumpeted by Madame Blavatsky and the Theosophists.

Monographs

We come next to consider a whole raft of anthropological treatises, beginning with two by Derleth's Professor Laban Shrewsbury: Investigations into the Myth-Patterns of Latter-Day Primitives, with Especial Reference to the 'R'lyeh Text' and Cthulhu in the Necronomicon. These monographs were probably based on real-life works of scholarship like Margaret Murray's The Witch-Cult in Western Europe and Sir James Frazer's The Golden Bough, and crank volumes like W. Scott-Eliot's The Story of Atlantis and the Lost Lemuria, all mentioned by Lovecraft.

Lin Carter contributed a shelf full of titles of this kind. His archaeologist Harold Hadley Copeland single-handedly produced Prehistory in the Pacific: A Preliminary Investigation with Reference to the Myth-Patterns of Southeast Asia, and Polynesian Mythology, with a Note on the Cthulhu Legend-Cycle, and The Prehistoric Pacific in the Light of the 'Ponape Scripture', and finally The Civilization of Mu, a Reconstruction in the Light of Recent Discoveries, with A Synoptic Comparison of the 'R'lyeh Text' and the 'Ponape Scripture'. Shrewsbury should have sued him. (Carter also embellished Lovecraft's brief mention of Gottfried Mülder, who wrote The Secret Mysteries of Asia, with a Commentary on the 'Ghorl Nigräl'.) In view of all this, it seems nearly miraculous that Brian Lumley's Sir Amery Wendy-Smith did not pen a tome with a title like Seismological Surveys of Mid-African Myth-Patterns, with Particular Reference to the 'G'harne Fragments'. . . . Now don't go getting ideas.

Inspired Poetry

Our next group of writings is constituted by the works of decadent poets. This is actually one of the oldest of the Mythos genres. The most famous example is Justin Geoffrey 's People of theMonolith (in Robert E. Howard's "The Black Stone", and Howard-and-Derleth's, "The House in the Oaks"). This notion of a too-sensitive artist driven to madness (though not delusion) by his visions of ultra-telluric horrors actually comes from HPL's "The Nameless City". There Abdul Alhazred, in his earliest appearance, is called "the mad poet". Asleep at the site of the buried city of intelligent dinosaurs, Alhazred wakes up in a cold sweat and sings this famous couplet:

That is not dead which can eternal lie
And with strange aeons, even death may die.

Similarly, Justin Geoffrey awakens after a bad night's sleep at the ancient shrine of toad-like Gol-Goroth, and composes these lines:

They say foul things of Old Times still lurk
In Dark forgotten corners of the world,
And gates still gape to loose on certain nights,
Shapes pent in Hell.

The musical compositions of Erich Zann and the pictures of Edward Upton Pickman derive from similar inspiration, as does Azathoth and Other Horrors by Lovecraft's poet Arthur Pickman Derby, We might also mention the disturbed sculptor Henry Anthony Wilcox and the demented writer Robert Blake.

Fritz Lelber in his "The Terror from the Depths", introduces his own mad poet, who is, like him, a German. He is Georg Roister Fischer, author of The Tunneler Below. Lumley's poetess is Ariel Prescott (Visions from Yaddith). Lin Carter serves as the literary agent for poets Edgar Henquist Gordon (Night Gaunts) and Wilbur Nathaniel Hoag (Dreams from R'lyeh) and prose writers Phillip Howard ("The House of the Worm" and "The Defilers"), and Amadaeus Carson (Black God of Madness), the latter pair being spin-offs from HPL's "Robert Blake", a fictional surrogate of his pal Robert Bloch. One may speculate that this genre of "inspired fiction" might have promised some welcome relief from the overuse of crumbling grimoires and chronicles in Mythos stories. But has it perhaps already been done to death? We know we're in trouble when Lumley actually has a character leaf through one of Lin Carter's works side-by-side with the Necronomicon!

Variant Versions

Last but not least, we consider a new and hopeful genre --- the "variant version". Here the idea is that a particular and peculiar edition of a well-known Mythos text holds special secrets. The implication is that the legends have grown in the telling, evidently by interpolation or mediumistic rewriting of the text by psychics. The clearest example of this is Lumley's Original Notes on the Necronomicon by occultist Joachim Feery. Lumley has characters call the work an "often-fanciful reconstruction" of Alhazred's text, containing pericopae unattested in any known manuscripts. We should probably so understand Bertln's "Liyuhh, the almost unknown German translation, or rather adaptation and analysis of the R'lyeh Text". Such tendentious recensions of older texts are hardly uncommon. Many grimoires have reached their present form by such an evolutionary process of redaction. Eldon J. Epp has also studied the theological slant of the famous "Western Text" of Luke-Acts in the New Testament. The "variant version", then, is a clever and innovative departure in Mythos lore, though its very attractiveness as a literary device will probably soon lead to its exhaustion. Would that new Mythos writers would imitate the originality of the creators of the several genres, rather than slavishly copying the specific products of that originality.