|
R'LYEH REVIEW
Issue 029
copyright © 1985 by Robert M. Price
reprinted by
permission of Robert M. Price
|
H. P. Lovecraft:
Juvenalia, 1895-1905
edited by S. T. Joshi
Necronomicon Press, 1984, 40 pp. $4.95
(Reviewed by Robert M.
Price)
Joshi and Michaud over
at Necronomicon Press have apparently decided to give young writers a break and
provide a showcase for their alleged talents. In this strange collection we are
introduced to some 15-year old kid and his execrable fiction and poetry. It is
like having to sit, skin-acrawling, through a violin recital by your little
nephew. Who can endure it with sanity intact? And you wonder: who is this
kid? Some relation of Michaud or Joshi? Why else would they print this drivel?
What potential they see in him escapes me. As a writer this lad'll never amount
to anything. Mark my words.
. . . huh? What's that
you say? Oh, well now, that changes things considerably! It seems
this is a collection of the childhood writings of H. P. Lovecraft himself! Now
you tell me! As I was saying, these little gems of childish wit and insight
amply display the genius that would later come to fruition in the adult works of
The Master. Every page shines with that sense of adventurous expectancy that
makes HPL's fiction so deservedly worshipped.
Seriously, folks, this
is an amusing and impressive little sheaf of literary curiosities, sort of like
looking at Lovecraft on a bear-skin rug. You can see the early roots of his
interest in the classics, his love of all things English, and even his hatred of
all things not English. De Triumpho Naturae, a poem written to
lament the freeing of black slaves ("The savage black, the ape-resembling
beast"), and an anti-Semitic cartoon and diatribe ("This man is a very
avaricious and filthy Jew") show what a bigot the young Lovecraft was. In
light of such evidence, how seriously can we take the claim of Lovecraftian
apologists that HPL's "racialist" views were considered and
sophisticated, albeit mistaken, opinions derived from the best of contemporary
anthropological scholarship? Poliakov in his The Aryan Myth and Stephen
Jay Gould in recent journal articles have indicated that all such
"scholarship" was either after-the-fact rationalization of racist
bigotry, or was subconsciously but radically warped by racist presuppositions.
Lovecraft's defenders would like to forgive his biased rantlngs as if the views
of fellow-bigots in his day gave him permission to hate and denigrate. But the
presence of such racist venom in even his very early jottings (see also the
gleeful racist hatred of "On the Creation of Niggers" in Saturnalia,
Crypt of Cthulhu #21) strongly suggests that Lovecraft first imbibed the
prejudice of his culture and then began to rationalize as was customary.
On a
more trivial note, it is mildly interesting to see how in his little tale
"The Mysterious Ship", young Howard introduces an idea that he would
often use later: "At the North Pole there exists a vast continent composed
of volcanic soil, a portion of which is open to explorers. It is called 'No-Mans
Land'" (p. 27). Not quite as catchy a name as "Lomar" or "Hyperborea",
is it?
|